Five Years Later
If I had had my act together this week, I would have written something coherent about the five-year anniversary of Columbine today. I reminded my wife at 12:30 this afternoon that five years ago right then very frantic news reports were coming off the TV and news helicopters were swarming overhead. Eight or ten of them were circling the area all day long. She still doesn’t like the sound when they fly near our house.
She had called me on my new cell phone–our first, bought because the baby was coming soon–to tell me that I might not want to come back from lunch by way of Bowles Avenue. I had heard all about it while I was getting my hair cut 45 minutes earlier: there was a bomb scare or some nut had a gun or something at Columbine, and the traffic would probably be bad. Twenty-five minutes before that, at 11:20am on April 20, 1999, I was at my insurance agent’s office, a couple of blocks away from the high school. Shots were probably being fired as I drove past the intersection of Quincy and Bowles, where a right turn leads you to the front door of national headlines.
It may sound odd to people who don’t live here, but Columbine compares well to September 11 in terms of its impact on this community. People were changed here, myself included. People were in a funk. Shocked, raw, uncertain what do to or how to react. Angry, even. I know I was angry. Angry, for some totally irrational reason, that I wasn’t there, and couldn’t have shot those two dead before they took those thirteen lives in the most Satanic outworking of adolescent angst ever imagined in Littleton. Like it was my fault. Don’t ask me.
I remember resenting the media in the week that followed. This wasn’t really their loss, but still they felt content to tear up the grass at Clement Park with their satellite uplinks and mobile production studios. Good Morning America was broadcast from the same park in which my son now takes skateboard lessons. Katie Couric does not belong in Clement Park. Her all-American cuteness and politically unbiased reporting belongs in Studio A in New York City, not in a field I can see from my back door when the trees drop their leaves. And most years, trees don’t really get their leaves until early May.
If you read this blog, you might guess that I am not the type to get all affected when bad things happen in distant places. When domestic terrorists kill scores of people by blowing up Federal buildings, or killer tornadoes rip up small towns in Oklahoma–remember, these are what passed for national tragedies in April of 1999–I don’t tend to come apart at the seams. Columbine, however, is anything but a distant place. I brooded; I played loud, cathartic music; I actually grieved. I am not an emotional man, so I was surprised when I discovered that Columbine had happened to me.
Nine days later Sarah was born. By baby number three, Nine Months Pregnant is not as scary as the first time around, but childbirth still has a way of refocusing a guy’s attention on the immediate. Over the next two or three months, as we recovered from the insanity of having a newborn, Columbine eventually receded in a literally gray and rainy past. Work, worship, raise the kids…we got over it.
Sarah turns five in a week. Plates, cups, and party favors have a Hello Kitty theme, by her choice. Columbine was a long time and a different country ago, but news helicopters still do it to me whenever they circle the neighborhood.
3 Responses to “Five Years Later”



I don’t know what it is about proximity of horrors like that…
on a much smaller scale, that whole ridiculous/spooky pizza bomber incident here last summer affected me surprisingly. Proportionate to the scale of the event being much smaller than Columbine, I wasn’t nearly as affected by it as you were. Yet there was something about it happening only five miles from here — something about the fact that I unknowingly came within a quarter mile of it and was redirected by the police shortly after it occurred because I hadn’t been tuned into the media and was planning to shop right across the street from it — that gave it a “whoa” quality that it wouldn’t have had if it had happened somewhere outside my orbit but still relatively near, like say Cleveland.
I wonder what it is about our natures that gives us this sense of ownership with things that are no more closely related to us than being physically closer than other equally serious matters?
Comment Permalink | Posted on April 21st, 2004 at 8:12 am |Great post, Tim. I knew you lived in Colorado, but I didn’t know you were so close to Columbine.
On a much lesser scale, I remember them serving a warrant in Davie, Florida on the evening of 9/11 on a home that was three or four miles from mine. They believed it had housed some of the suspected hijackers. At that point, the anxiety level was breaking the meter, of course. I remember thinking “these people were HERE. I lived among them.” The Davie thing didn’t pan out, though a number of the hijackers did live within 15 or 20 miles of me.
Four of the hijackers lived less than a mile from my work in small neighborhood I lived in when I first moved down here. They bought plane tickets at travel agencies I know well and box cutters at a store I frequent.
The overriding feeling was disbelief at being in the presence of that sort of evil and not knowing it. It’s not just people “out there” who do these kinds of things, it’s people who I’m standing behind in the sandwich line at Subway. It causes you to look at people differently, I think.
Comment Permalink | Posted on April 21st, 2004 at 9:36 am |John — that brings back another similar memory, though this one even more distant. I remember that it came out shortly after 9/11 that some of the hijackers had been getting wire transfers at a Giant supermarket in Laurel, MD. My brother lives in Laurel and I know my sister-in-law has been known to frequent the Giant. It’s a mystery why this was more disturbing to me than the news that they were doing it at an A&P in East Podunk would have been, but it was.
Comment Permalink | Posted on April 21st, 2004 at 10:01 am |